Description
I need an outline for that research question.
Are liars better at detecting when others are lying compared to non-liars?
OUTSMARTING THE LIARS: TOWARD A COGNITIVE LIE DETECTION APPROACH: FIVE DECADES OF LIE DETECTION RESEARCH HAVE SHOWN THAT PEOPLE’S ABILITY TO DETECT DECEPTION BY OBSERVING BEHAVIOR AND LISTENING TO SPEECH IS LIMITED…
https://www.jstor.org/stable/23045711?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/23045711.pdf?refreqid=excelsior%3Ab1f963201de7439e6e140623c4976df7
A FEW CAN CATCH A LIAR: RESEARCH SUGGESTS THAT MOST PEOPLE CANNOT TELL FROM DEMEANOR WHEN OTHERS ARE LYING…
GOOD LIARS: A NEGLECTED AREA IN DECEPTION RESEARCH IS WHAT CONSTITUTES A GOOD LIAR. ON THE BASIS OF DECEPTION THEORY, PEOPLE’S VIEWS ABOUT HOW LIARS RESPOND, IMPRESSION…
“UM, I CAN TELL YOU’RE LYING”: LINGUISTIC MARKERS OF DECEPTION VERSUS TRUTH-TELLING IN SPEECH LYING IS A DELIBERATE ATTEMPT TO TRANSMIT MESSAGES THAT MISLEAD OTHERS. ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE BEHAVIORS HOLDS GREAT PROMISE AS AN OBJECTIVE METHOD OF DETECTING DECEPTION…
IT TAKES AN INSECURE LIAR TO CATCH A LIAR: THE LINK BETWEEN ATTACHMENT INSECURITY, DECEPTION, AND DETECTION OF DECEPTION
by showing that it takes a good liar – one high in attachment insecurity – to detect another liar…
Lies and deceptions are prevalent in our daily lives, yet most people merely guess when attempting to distinguish between lies and truths. In the current research, we examined the validity of the saying that “it takes a thief to know a thief” by showing that it takes a good liar – one high in attachment insecurity – to detect another liar. In Study 1, 68 card players participated in a Bullshit tournament – a card game in which players try to deceive other players while also striving to detect their deceptions. In Study 2 (N=99), people who cheated on their romantic partner (versus those who did not) were asked to detect cues of infidelity. Results confirmed our expectations and showed that good liars and cheaters, who are usually insecure individuals, are better at detecting lies and dishonesty. These results are discussed from the perspective of social defense theory, highlighting the utility of personality traits that are often deemed maladaptive. •Our goal is to validate the saying that “it takes a thief to know a thief”.•Highly anxious people are better liars and better lie detectors.•Highly insecure people cheat more and are more accurate at detecting infidelity.
OUTSMARTING THE LIARS: TOWARD A COGNITIVE LIE DETECTION APPROACH
Vrij, Aldert ; Granhag, Pär Anders ; Mann, Samantha ; Leal, Sharon Current directions in psychological science : a journal of the American Psychological Society, 2011-02-01, Vol.20 (1), p.28-32 …. We present an innovative lie detection perspective based on cognitive load, demonstrating that it is possible to ask questions that raise cognitive load more in liars than in truth tellers…
- Deception and truth detection when analyzing nonverbal and verbal cues
From observing target persons’ nonverbal behavior to analyzing their speech; (b) from lie detection based on differences between truth tellers and liars’ levels of arousal
COMMENTARY: CAN ORDINARY PEOPLE DETECT DECEPTION AFTER ALL?
Street, Chris N H ; Vadillo, Miguel A
CUES TO DECEPTION IN CONTEXT: RESPONSE LATENCY/GAPS IN DENIALS AND BLAME SHIFTING
Reynolds, Edward ; Rendle-Short, Johanna
British journal of social psychology, 2011-09, Vol.50 (3), p.431-449
…and Reid and Arthur (1953) . Inspired by Ekman and Friesen’s (1969) hypothesis that lies can be detected by subtle signals that liars emit while lying, 40 years..
Do you need help with this assignment or any other? We got you! Place your order and leave the rest to our experts.