Lumber Company

Question 1

Police must obey the law in their effort to control crime. Legal restrictions may hurt the efficiency of police but by obeying the law, police gain social legitimacy. When a police officer violates the law, they jeopardize the rights of the accused and the rights of the innocent. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution states:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched and the persons or things seized.”

Read Weeks v. United States, Silverthorne Lumber Company, Inc., Et Al. v. United States (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., and Mapp v. Ohio . For each court case, address the following:

  1. Explain the main issue or question involved in the case.
  2. Explain the precedent or laws the court used in order to come to its ultimate conclusion.
  3. Explain how the court applied the law to the facts of the case.
  4. Identify the conclusion and restate the issue to provide the final answer.

How have these three cases formed the standards of constitutional searches and seizures in the United States?

Question 2

Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you include the following:

  • An outline of the history of policing in America to present day
  • The impact of historical figures (such as Sir Robert Peel) on the function of policing
  • The relationship between current police functions and the law

Include a minimum of three references.

Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

Do you need help with this assignment or any other? We got you! Place your order and leave the rest to our experts.

Quality Guaranteed

Any Deadline

No Plagiarism