Define and explain internalism and externalism regarding justification (as seen in chapter 4 of Martin). Can you outline a possible compromise between the two radical positions, so that some aspects from both positions are included? Once your compromise is clearly stated, what modifications does it imply, if any, for the definition of knowledge in the textbook (Martin p.36), or for that supported by Ayer?
Do you need help with this assignment or any other? We got you! Place your order and leave the rest to our experts.