Instructions
Each participant will write a case analysis for a mid-term evaluation. The Mid-Term Case Analysis paper must be submitted
under the Case Analysis Papers module on Brightspace by 11:59pm on the due date. (Assignments sent via email will not be
graded.)
Formatting
The Mid-Term Case Analysis paper should meet the following requirements:
- 3 – 4 double-spaced, typed pages
o A title page and an outline are not required. Front matter (such as a title page or outline) as well as the
bibliography do not count toward the total number of pages.
o Times New Roman font, 12 point size - Left and right margins no larger than 1.25 inches; top and bottom margins no larger than 1 inch
- All sources must be cited
o Parenthetical citations (author, page) should be used in the body of the paper
o A Works Cited page using MLA formatting should appear at the end of the paper - First page header should include the following, single-spaced lines:
o Upper-right-hand corner should include the participant’s name (first and last), course title, and date
o Below the date, centered, the title of the paper - Subsequent page headers (at the top) should include the following:
o Last name of the participant at the right margin
o Page number at the center
o Full or abbreviated title at the left margin - Paper saved with a .doc or .docx file extension
o First and Last name of the participant should be in the file name
▪ FirstLastMidTerm.doc - Additional Instructions
o Each paper must contain the following sections (in this order):
▪ Reason for the Case
▪ Summary of the Case
▪ Relevant Ethical Theories
▪ Analysis
▪ Recommendations
RELS 105 | Winter 2024 MID-TERM 2 DOYLE
Grading Rubric
The instructor will grade papers in the following areas: - Formatting
o Is your paper formatted according to the guidelines above? - Citations and references
o Are all your sources cited? Did you use the appropriate style format? - Organization
o Are your sections clearly labeled? Does each section address the appropriate subject matter? - Coherence
o Are your sentences structured properly? Do your arguments follow logically? - Comprehensiveness
o Have you addressed all the ethics issues in the case? Does your paper reflect material covered in the course? - Ethical Issue Recognition
o Have you recognized the ethical issues in the case? Can recognize interrelationships among the issues? - Application of ethical principles and theories
o Have you stated a position (recommendations)? Did you apply accurately ethical principles and theories to
support the position?
Please note: A complete rubric (with grading scale) is posted to Brightspace.
Reminder
The Mid-Term Case Analysis paper is to be completed individually.
Any attempt to ask for assistance (for any reason) or provide assistance (for any reason) is a violation of
Felician University’s Policy on Academic Honesty and should be turned over to the professor immediately.
As per the syllabus, a plagiarized paper will result in an automatic failure on the assignment. This
includes the use of any AI or grammar editing tools.
All papers will be submitted to Turnitin, which checks for plagiarism and use of AI.
RELS 105 | Winter 2024 MID-TERM 3 DOYLE
Mid-Term Case Analysis Template
Reason for the Case:
[Put one sentence here describing the reason(s) for the case. Language from the course should be used.]
(Approximate length: 1 sentence)
Summary of the Case:
[Summarize the relevant details of the case here. After reading this section, the reader should have a good sense of the facts and
what ethical issues are apparent in the case. This section is primarily descriptive and sets the tone for the rest of the paper.]
(Approximate length: 4 – 5 sentences)
Relevant Ethics Theories:
[Define the relevant ethics theories (at least 2: Utilitarianism, Kantian Ethics, Virtue Ethics, or Ethics of Care) to which one might
appeal or need in the analysis of the case. This section should include clear definitions of theories based on course data.
Definitions should be based on the course text, including clear references to the readings with proper citations. Lectures and
other course tools may be used as secondary sources. (These also must be properly cited.) Each definition should be welldeveloped, including several sentences: 1 sentence should include the ought statement from class, 1 sentence should include the
textbook definition, and one sentence should include your own synthesis of the theory. There won’t be any mention of the case
in this section. This section just defines the theories which will be applied to the case in the next section.]
(Approximate length: 1 page)
Analysis:
[Use the two theories which were defined in the previous section to analyze the case. This section should relate directly to the
previous section. (How and Why are the theories defined above relevant to the ethical issues found in the case.) This section
should relate course information in a clear, concise manner to the case. That is, there should be a clear connection between the
case, the relevant theories (from the previous section) and the analysis. This section begins the process of prescriptive ethics
work.]
(Approximate length: 1 page)
Recommendations:
[Provide recommendations in the form of action items, points of consideration, and/or suggestions for addressing the ethical
issues found in the case. These recommendations should follow logically and coherently from the analysis in the previous section
(that is, the reader should easily recognize the rationale for these in the previous section). This section highlights the prescriptive
process of ethics and, therefore, should contain several clear, concise “ought statements.”]
(Approximate length: 4 – 5 sentences)
RELS 105 | Winter 2024 MID-TERM 4 DOYLE
The Case
Delilah (pgp: she/her) is a college student at a large university. She is a double major in Philosophy and Political Science, is
involved with several, on-campus clubs, and works a part-time job.
Delilah is very focused on her education and career growth at this stage in her life and in the rare free moments she has, she
enjoys spending time with her housemates who are her best friends. She isn’t against dating, but she knows that relationships
take time and is not sure she has the availability for a girlfriend. That being said, she has told her roommates several times that
if she finds the right person, she will make time for her.
Lily, Delilah’s roommate, has been trying to set up her friend with someone for a long time. Lily is under the impression that
Delilah needs someone to help her enjoy the moment and not just focus on the future. Lily sets Delilah up with her girlfriend’s
best friend, Jessica (pgp: they/their). She tells Delilah to just go to coffee with Jessica and see if they are a match. Delilah agrees
to go to coffee with Jessica.
At coffee, Delilah struggles to find anything in common with Jessica. She thinks she is nice, but she also doesn’t feel that she is
someone she wants to date. Jessica’s interests and hobbies are very different from Delilah’s. Delilah enjoys the conversation with
them, but she decides she doesn’t want to pursue anything after coffee.
When leaving the coffee shop, Jessica tells Delilah they had a good time and would like to get to know her. They give Delilah their
phone number and asks her if he will call them later. Delilah knows she isn’t going to call Jessica. She has no interest in pursuing
them for a relationship and is already so strapped for time. However, she tells them she will call because she thinks it is better
to be nice than to tell him the truth.
Delilah later explains to you what has happened. She asks you if he should contact Jessica to tell them the truth.
Do you need help with this assignment or any other? We got you! Place your order and leave the rest to our experts.