Denied Justice

Question 1

You are not required to write your answer in an essay format. However, you should coherently organize your points and put them into proper sentences. The answers should be comprehensive and clear. In your answer, you should provide examples wherever it is necessary. there is no need for quotes/citations/bibliography or paraphrases and you are free to use any sources that you like to gather information as long as it is being written in your own words and not copy pasted.

1 outline and elaborate on the main principles of Canadian constitution.

2- outline and elaborate on main events/developments that eventually led to Canadian political independence from Britain

3- Outline and elaborate on factors behind western alienation.

4-What is regionalism, what are causes of regionalism and how has Canadian government attempted to address regional disparities?

5- Specify and elaborate on the main models of inter-group relations. which of these models have been adopted by Canada?

Question 2

This week we examined two different ways of interpreting the Constitution. Using one or the other as a basis, make a case for or against the constitutionality of Roe v. Wade. State clearly from the beginning which school of thought you are flowing, then take a position, and finally show how your school of thought on constitutional interpretation informs a position you will take on retaining or overturning Roe v. Wade. Remember this is not so much a paper on the restriction of abortion as it is a paper using constitutional interpretation as a method to justify a position on Roe v. Wade, one way or the other.

In addition to the arguments on original meaning in the text book, read and use the Unit 3, 3.2 on the restriction of abortion. Your paper needs to be a minimum of 500 words. Use APA standards. You may not use Wikipedia for a source.