Business, Politics and Law

In today’s social and economic environment, the nature of work has become increasingly complex. In
a recent survey with some of the CEOs of the Forbes top-100 companies in the USA it was found
that most company’s top executives generally believe they now operate in a substantially more
volatile, uncertain and complex world and have to deal with increasingly interconnected economies,
enterprises, societies and governments.
The content of this module draws on the world-class expertise of the Business School in introducing
students to systems approaches and their application in multicultural and complex global business
environments. The systems approach offers a set of theoretically grounded and proven
methodologies that help to improve decision-making under uncertain context, where decisions are
not straight forward.
Throughout this module there will be a focus on developing sustainable and responsible
management practices, a key factor for the business leaders of tomorrow.
1.Key contacts
Module leader:
• Roberto Palacios-Rodriguez
• e-mail: R.Palacios-Rodriguez@hull.ac.uk
• Office: Nidd Building – Room 119
2.Using your University email address
The Business School sends ALL formal communication with students to their University email
accounts. Any of the staff listed above may try and contact you via your University email address. As
a result all students should check their University email address on a regular basis.
Failure to do so will mean you miss out on important information.
Hull University Business School 3/9
Module Handbook

  1. Teaching sessions
    Date Time Location Topic Content Reading
    January 31 13:00 FB-LD Module introduction Module introduction, evaluation, structure.
    The origins of Systems thinking. Ch. 1-4
    February 2 12:00 A.L.T. Systems Thinking Systems thinking: increasing our
    understanding Ch. 8
    February 7 13:00 FB-LD Systemic
    perspectives
    Complex adaptive systems and the Five
    systemic perspectives. Ch. 5-7
    February 9 12:00 A.L.T. Interrelationships
    perspective Systems dynamics Ch. 11
    February 11
    11:00 DER-LT1
    The five systemic perspectives (machine, organism, etc.)
    12:00 DER-SR1
    13:00 DER SR-3
    15:00 BJL TR6
    February 14 13:00 Online Interrelationships
    perspective SD in action and Critique Ch. 11
    February 16 12:00 Online
    Machine perspective OR and Systems Engineering Ch. 9
    February 21 13:00 Online
    February 23 12:00 Online
    People’s perspective Game theory: accommodating multiple
    interests February 28 13:00 FB-LD
    March 2 12:00 A.L.T. Organism
    perspective
    The principles of VSD and the Viable
    Systems Model Ch. 13
    March 7 13:00 FB-LD
    March 9 12:00 A.L.T. People’s perspective Systems Assumption Surfacing and Testing Ch. 14
    March 11
    11:00 DER-LT1
    The logic and inner workings of System Dynamics
    12:00 DER-SR1
    13:00 DER SR-3
    15:00 BJL TR6
    March 14 13:00 Online People’s perspective Systems Assumption Surfacing and Testing Ch. 14
    March 16 12:00 Online
    People’s perspective Interactive Planning philosophy and
    methodology Ch. 15
    March 21 13:00 FB-LD
    March 23 12:00 A.L.T. People’s perspective The Soft Systems Methodology Ch. 16
    March 25
    11:00 DER-LT1
    The stock and flow diagrams
    12:00 DER-SR1
    13:00 DER SR-3
    15:00 BJL TR6
    March 28 13:00 FB-LD
    People’s perspective
    The Soft Systems Methodology Ch. 16
    March 30 12:00 A.L.T. The Re-organization Methodology
    April 1 11:00 DER-LT1 Creating models and scenarios
    4/9 Hull University Business School
    Module Handbook
    12:00 DER-SR1
    13:00 DER SR-3
    15:00 BJL TR6
    April 6 12:00 Online
    Societal/environmental
    perspective
    CSH principles and Ulrich’s Boundary
    judgment Ch. 18
    April 25 13:00 FB-LD
    April 27 12:00 A.L.T. Critical Systems Thinking in practice
    April 29
    11:00 DER-LT1
    Module assignments: Q&A
    12:00 DER-SR1
    13:00 DER SR-3
    15:00 BJL TR6
    May 2 13:00 FB-LD Problem Solving Systems thinking, systems practice Ch. 21
    4.Coursework submission – dates and times
    The table below provides details of the final date and time by which work must be submitted.
    Students may hand in work at any time prior to these deadlines, and are encouraged not to wait until
    the final deadline.
    Date Time Topic/Title Location
    May 18th, 2022 16:00 Individual work: Case Study. CANVAS
    May 25th, 2022 16:00 Individual assignment: System dynamics analysis of
    one grand-challenge (e.g. poverty, pollution, migration).
    CANVAS
  2. Assessment task and assessment criteria for coursework
    The module is assessed by two elements:
    a) Individual work to solve the case study defined (50%).
    b) Individual essay of one grand challenge through the System Dynamics
    methodology (50%).
    a. Case study:
    Based on the “DDS Case Study”, you are asked to present a report containing the following
    elements:
    a) A brief description of the company’s current situation.
    Hull University Business School 5/9
    Module Handbook
    b) The systemic analysis of the problem context the company is in, using the different
    “systemic perspectives”.
    c) An analysis of the interrelationships among the different situations the company
    faces and the identification of the form of complexity, better representing the
    problem context the company is in.
    d) For the problem under focus identify the leading and supporting system-based
    methodologies you would use to increase your understanding of the situation as
    explained in the case study. Justify your choices.
    e) Based on the system methodologies selected identify five to seven ideas you
    consider relevant in order to improve the problem context as highlighted by the
    chosen methodologies
    Point b above requires you to identify the different issues associated with the problem
    context through the different lenses of the different systemic perspectives.
    Considering the form of complexity we face in a given situation is defined by the intensity
    and frequency of the interactions among the system’s constituent elements, functions and
    purposes; for point c above define what form of complexity is that the company face. For
    that purpose the use of a rich-picture or a causal-loop diagram will be a good idea. Attached
    these, or any other, diagrams in the appendix of your report.
    In point d you are asked to identify the methodologies you would select to make sense of
    the problem context. It is true that in point c, if you made use of a rich picture or a causal loop diagram, you have use already either Checkland’s SSM or a System Dynamics tool,
    but for this point explain what benefit your selected methodologies, can produce to help the
    analyst make sense of such complex context.
    Finally, in point e you are asked to identify some ideas that could improve the situation the
    company of the case study is in. The number of five suggestions/ideas is the minimum,
    seven a good option. But more important than the number is the relationship the ideas have
    with the systems-based methodologies chosen.
    For guidance about the presentation of the report use the “Evaluation rubric for case study analysis”.
    b. Individual project using System Dynamics Modelling:
    The media often reports on a range of grand challenges that are complex in nature and
    have significant social, political, environmental and economic effects. Some
    examples of grand challenges are:
    • poverty and inequality
    • climate change
    • pollution
    • drug trafficking
    • modern slavery
    6/9 Hull University Business School
    Module Handbook
    • forced immigration
    • draught
    • prejudice and intolerance.
    Your task: Write an essay (2250 words excluding tables, figures and appendices) in
    which you present a system dynamics analysis of one grand challenge of your choice.
    To analysis needs to include the following elements:
  3. Introduce the essay and the grand challenge that you have chosen to address.
    Present some descriptive statistics in order to establish the critical importance of the
    problem chosen. No reference previous to 2017 is accepted1.
  4. Create a causal-loop diagram OF YOUR OWN. The model should contain no less
    than 20 variables. Balancing and reinforcing loops should be clearly indicated and
    the value – positive or negative – of every single connector has to be stated.
  5. Present an explanation of the grand challenge based in the model you have
    developed. You do NOT need to go through every single relationship in the model,
    but to identify how the problem structure conditions / limits / determines the
    behavior of the problem under scrutiny.
    Assume you are explaining to a non-expert audience what the problem context is,
    how it is possible to make sense of such a complex situation and why some of the
    commonly acceptable “solutions” are short lived or do not solve the root-causes of
    the problem.
  6. Based in your model identify at least two solutions or course of action
    (leverage variables) which, you believe will help to improve the effects of the gran
    challenge. Make sure you establish if the suggested strategies differs / coincides
    with existing actions and measures currently in place to take the problem.
  7. Once you have completed the analysis you need to critically evaluate the System
    Dynamics methodology as a suitable strategy / tool at revealing insights and
    informing actions in complex problem situations.
    Make sure you use proper referencing technique (see the University of Hull library resources for that
    purpose: https://libguides.hull.ac.uk/referencing) and include a reference list of all sources cited.
    6.Coursework submission – procedure
    e Submission is the approved method for your HUBS program of study. You must hand in your
    assessed Assignment(s), using the CANVAS system. Submission of a printed copy is NOT allowed.
    You should submit via the Assignments menu item on the relevant module CANVAS site.
    Hull University Business School 7/9
    Module Handbook
    There are special versions of the Coursework Coversheet which you must use if you are making a
    group submission or if you have a disability (which has been recognized formally by the University).
    These are also available from the ‘Making an Electronic Coursework Submission’ folder of the Files
    section on the Program support CANVAS site.
    You must complete the first page of the Coversheet accurately and in full. If you make a mistake this
    could result in you not getting credit for your work.
    When you submit your assignments they are stored electronically and submitted automatically to the
    Turn it in system. The uses of the Turn it in system will be explained to you and details are available
    from the HUBS Turnitin2 CANVAS site.
    If you are unfamiliar with e Submission you are advised to consult your program CANVAS site and
    work through the “Making an e Submission Guide”. The guide will show you how to use the system
    and is set up to help you to practice submitting assignments in advance of the ‘real’ assignment
    submissions. This allows you to see how the Turn it in system works.
    You are strongly advised to make your electronic submission well ahead of the deadline (we suggest
    a minimum of 3 hours) to ensure that you have time to produce the required documentation. Failure
    to make effective use of the e Submission system will not be accepted as grounds for an extension,
    or mitigation.
    Assignments must be submitted by the date and time stipulated. Deadlines will be strictly adhered
    to. Students submitting late, and who do not have mitigating circumstances approved by the
    Mitigating Circumstances Panel, will be subject to penalties for late submission specified by the
    University. Please note that Saturday and Sunday are treated as “working days” for the purposes of
    the late submission policy.
    If a mark of less than the pass mark is received on an assessment element then you should wait for
    the decision of the relevant module board which will inform you of your next step.
    7.Module specification
    RATIONALE:
    In today’s social and economic environment, the nature of work has become increasingly complex. In
    a recent survey with some of the CEOs of the Forbes top-100 companies in the USA it was found
    that most company’s top executives generally believe they now operate in a substantially more
    volatile, uncertain and complex world and have to deal with increasingly interconnected economies,
    enterprises, societies and governments. These CEOs also reported serious doubts about their
    abilities to manage the challenges and opportunities arising from such rapidly escalating complexity.
    The content of this module draws on the world-class expertise of the Business School in introducing
    students to systems approaches and their application in multicultural and complex global business
    environments. The systems approach offers a set of theoretically grounded and proven
    8/9 Hull University Business School
    Module Handbook
    methodologies that help to improve decision-making under uncertain context, where decisions are
    not straight forward.
    Throughout this module there will be a focus on developing sustainable and responsible
    management practices, a key factor for the business leaders of tomorrow.
    AIMS AND DISTINCTIVE FEATURES:
    This module is distinctive in focusing on an approach to systems that is critical in orientation. It
    aims to provide:
    • An overview of systems concepts and approaches, their different paradigmatic
    assumptions and the systems thinking skills that they emphasize;
    • An understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of different systems approaches in
    the context of action research projects;
    • Experience of applying a range of system methodologies.
    • Develop the ability to understand and model a dynamic system.
    • Create sensitivity analysis about alternative courses of action and to evaluate the impact
    of “economic shock” to the system.
    LEARNING OUTCOMES:
    To be able to:
  8. Demonstrate an understanding of key systems concepts and a range of systems
    approaches;
  9. Choose or design a systems methodology which is appropriate to the context of concern;
  10. Assess barriers and facilitating factors which might impact on how a particular systems
    approach is employed in a given context of concern;
  11. Apply the systems dynamics concept and modelling techniques.
  12. Evaluate the effects of the application of a particular systems approach. In order to model
    and evaluate the impact of alternative decisions.
    Alternative reassessment strategy:
    Candidates failing this module will be reassessed on the basis of a 4,000-word individual
    assignment.
    Students permitted to defer assessment in the presentation may be set an alternative form of
    assessment, at the next available assessment opportunity.
    Arrangements for revision and private study:
    It is expected that students will undertake private study based on guided reading and class
    assignments throughout the duration of the module. Contact office hours will be provided. Should you
    require a further meeting with any member of the academic team or module leader.
    Module constraints:
    Hull University Business School 9/9
    Module Handbook
    No pre/post-requisite requirements have been recorded for this module.
    8.Reading and resources list
    Main textbooks:
    • Jackson, M.C. (2019), Critical Systems Thinking and the Management of
    Complexity, Wiley.
    Indicative reading:
    M. C. Jackson, (2006) Creative holism: a critical systems approach to complex problem solving (vol.
    23, pp 647-657) Systems Research and Behavioral Science
    Russell Ackoff and Jamshid Gharajedaghi, 1996, “Reflections on Systems and their Models”,
    Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 13-23.
    Jay Forrester, “Counter Intuitive Behavior of Social Systems”, Jay W. Forrester, “Counterintuitive
    Behavior of Social Systems”, Technology Review, Vol. 73, No. 3, Jan. 1971, pp. 52-68 (can be
    downloaded from: http://www.constitution.org/ps/cbss.htm)
    Russel L. Ackoff, “Systems Thinking and Thinking Systems,” Systems Dynamics Review, Vol. 10,
    No. 2-3, Summer-Fall 1994, pp. 175-188
    Russell Ackoff, “The New Age,” Systems Practice, Vol. 8, No. 4, August 1995, pp. 359-360.
    J.E. Wolstenholme, 2003, “Towards the definition and use of a core set of archetypical structures in
    systems dynamics”, System Dynamics Review, Spring, Vol. 19. No. 1

Do you need help with this assignment or any other? We got you! Place your order and leave the rest to our experts.

Quality Guaranteed

Any Deadline

No Plagiarism