Directions:
Answer each long answer question below. Question 1 is worth 30 points, and Questions 2 and 3 are worth 35 points each, for a total of 100 points (and 25% of your final grade).
Your answer to each question should be roughly one page, double-spaced (Times New Roman 12 pt font or similar). The total written content should not exceed three double-spaced pages, not including a title and reference page. The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate your comprehension and application of the course material. Your responses to the questions should show understanding of the course material and critical thinking and reasoning (see chapter 2). You are graded on each question collectively, consisting of understanding of material, solid critical thinking and reasoning applied, as well as proper academic writing (e.g., grammar, spelling, paragraph format, citations, etc.).
Use the course textbook and weekly content (recorded lectures and videos) to help you answer these questions. You should not/do not need to use external resources to answer these questions, but you are welcome to use them if you would like. Be sure to properly cite when necessary. You should use either APA or Chicago when citing. There are citation guidelines you can find online to assist you with this. As students, you are meant to be resourceful, so be sure to look for, and apply, citation guidelines. Library resources can also be helpful here.
- Explain the difference between deontology and consequentialism. In your opinion, which theory is more plausible? Why?
- Read case study 7.1 in your textbook regarding animal rights (p. 120). Do you think animals should have the same legal rights as human beings? Why/why not?
- Discuss one criticism of virtue ethics. In your opinion, does this criticism make the theory implausible? Why/why not?
Do you need help with this assignment or any other? We got you! Place your order and leave the rest to our experts.