Appropriate Level

Question 1

This question derives from a lingering debate between leadership and management. There are numerous scholarly articles comparing and contrasting the two. Write a brief essay comparing and contrasting leadership and management. Also, share one personal example where both were applicable to a situation. If you do not have a personal example, think of a situation where both could be applied. Your response should be at least 500 words in length.

Question 2

This question involves using your critical thinking skills to compare leadership theories. Write a brief essay that compares and contrasts Fiedler’s contingency model and the path-goal theory. What are the key similarities and differences, and which theory do you think is more applicable for leaders? Your response should be at least 500 words in length.

Question 3

Read the Ford 2016 Annual Report prepared under the US GAAP by clicking here. Pick any two of the financial statements: the consolidated balance sheet (statement of financial position) the consolidated income statement (statement of income or statement of comprehensive income) the statement of cash flows for Ford. Recast the two selected financial statements and present the statements following/in accordance with the IFRS, presentation-wise, as accurately as you can (you do not need to restate any of the results for Ford in this process-just work with the results as presented). The recasted financial statements should be an Exhibit or Appendix to your paper. Describe, in an appropriate level of detail, the differences that resulted when you recasted your chosen financial statements from the US GAAP to the IFRS, supported with references from the readings in this module or outside references, where appropriate.