3011.1.1 : Strategy as a Process
The graduate identifies the strategic process and the execution of a strategic plan.
3011.1.2 : Fundamental Perspectives on Strategy
The graduate assesses the fundamental perspectives on strategic decision-making using analytical tools.
3011.1.3 : Winning Strategies and Maximizing Strategic Power
The graduate analyzes generic strategies for winning a competitive advantage and determines how to apply maximum strategic power.
3011.1.4 : International and Multi-Business Strategies
The graduate assesses the value of competing in international markets and determines the risks and rewards of diversification strategies.
3011.1.5 : Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, Environmental Sustainability, and Strategy
The graduate analyzes the concepts of ethics, corporate social responsibility, and environmental sustainability and assesses the impact these policies have on strategic decision-making.
3011.1.6 : The Framework for Communicating and Executing Strategy
The graduate evaluates the framework necessary to effectively execute strategy.
INTRODUCTION
You will use your analysis from task 1 to create a business strategy for the company you chose in task 1. While there is no minimum length, this business strategy should be concise while addressing all the topics listed in the prompts below.
Note: Any information that would be considered confidential, proprietary, or personal in nature should not be included in the actual task submission to WGU. Do not include the actual names of people, suppliers, the organization(s), or other identifiable information. Fictional names should be used. Also, organization-specific data, including financial information, should not be included but should be addressed in a general fashion as appropriate. Work performed for a client or an employer is their property and should not be used without written permission.
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. The originality report that is provided when you submit your task can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
A. Create a business strategy in report format by doing the following:
- Create an executive summary that includes the following points:
- the vision, mission, and value statement of the business
- the execution of a strategy
- the financial evaluation of the strategy
- a conclusion or summary of the business strategy
- Discuss the vision, mission, and values statement completed in task 2, part A1.
- Justify the analytical tools used in developing your strategy.
- Include the detailed SWOT analysis from task 1.
- Discuss your plan for maintaining competitive advantage.
- Discuss the implications of competing in international markets.
- Discuss a diversification strategy that should be considered in your business strategy.
- Discuss at least one ethical consideration of your strategy.
- Discuss your planned execution of the strategy.
- Discuss how you would use ROI (return on investments) and cost-benefit analysis as part of your business strategy.
- Create a conclusion for your business strategy.
B. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
C. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
RUBRIC
C:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic. APPROACHING COMPETENCE
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective. COMPETENT
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
Rubric
A1:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide an executive summary that includes the given points.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The candidate provides an executive summary that includes the given points, with insufficient detail.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides an executive summary that includes the given points, with sufficient detail.
A2:VISION, MISSION, AND VALUES STATEMENT
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the vision, mission, and values statement completed in task 2, part A1.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of the vision, mission, and values statement completed in task 2, part A1.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of the vision, mission, and values statement completed in task 2, part A1.
A3:JUSTIFY ANALYTICAL TOOLS
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide a logical justification of the analytical tools used in developing the strategy.
APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe candidate provides a logical justification, with insufficient support, of the analytical tools used in developing the strategy.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical justification, with sufficient support, of the analytical tools used in developing the strategy.
A4:DETAILED SWOT ANALYSIS
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide the detailed SWOT analysis from task 1.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
Not applicable.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides the detailed SWOT analysis from task 1.
A5:MAINTAINING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the plan for maintaining competitive advantage.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of the plan for maintaining competitive advantage.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of the plan for maintaining competitive advantage.
A6:COMPETING IN INTERNATIONAL MARKETS
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the implications of competing in international markets.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of the implications of competing in international markets.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of the implications of competing in international markets.
A7:DIVERSIFICATION STRATEGY
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of a diversification strategy that should be considered in the business strategy.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of a diversification strategy that should be considered in the business strategy.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of a diversification strategy that should be considered in the business strategy.
A8:ETHICAL CONSIDERATION
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of at least 1 ethical consideration of the strategy.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of at least 1 ethical consideration of the strategy.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of at least 1 ethical consideration of the strategy.
A9:PLANNED STRATEGY EXECUTION
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the planned execution of the strategy.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of the planned execution of the strategy.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of the planned execution of the strategy.
A10:ROI AND COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of how the candidate would use ROI (return on investments) and cost-benefit analysis as part of the business strategy.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with insufficient detail, of how the candidate would use ROI (return on investments) and cost-benefit analysis as part of the business strategy.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of how the candidate would use ROI (return on investments) and cost-benefit analysis as part of the business strategy.
A11:CONCLUSION
NOT EVIDENT
The candidate does not provide a conclusion for the business strategy.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The candidate provides a conclusion, with insufficient detail, for the business strategy.
COMPETENT
The candidate provides a conclusion, with sufficient detail, for the business strategy.
B:SOURCES
NOT EVIDENT
The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.
COMPETENT
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
C:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
NOT EVIDENT
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.
APPROACHING COMPETENCE
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.
COMPETENT
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
Do you need help with this assignment or any other? We got you! Place your order and leave the rest to our experts.