Warfighting function WfF for Intelligence MISO

Thanks and kind regards.

Individual Assessment of the Assessment Execution

Name: <Range Last Name, First Name>	Staff Group: <##X>
War Prosecution Function: INTELLIGENCE (MISO) WfF Warfighting function	Date: <dd, mm, yyy>
	Department: <Dept>
Instructions: Develop a current estimate based on your assigned combat function (WfF) using the format provided. Its appraisal performance must demonstrate an analysis of the division’s operations in relation to Intelligence (MISO) . Your estimate should encompass the entire combat function of MISO Intelligence warfighting functionand not focus on a particular branch. You may refer to OPORD, presentation Annex B, FM 5-0 Order Planning and Production (dated May 16, 2022),  attached or sent by email other relevant doctrinal publications, any scenario information, including maps and charts, developed MDMP products, curriculum products, maps, charts, and CPCE/JPS products that you feel may assist you in completing this requirement. Fill in the question on pages 3,4, and 5 on the M431 English Rubrica No1, based on the MISO Intelligence warfighting function and utilizing the documents sent. Thank you   Your answers should be clear, concise sentences using proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Your submission should not exceed three to four pages, Times New Roman font, size 11, single-spaced.

Module IV                                                                                               Divisional Offensive Operations

Component	Excellent
Completeness of data/information (30%): Sufficient data should be collected/provided to support relevant conclusions and recommendations. See FM 5-0 (dated 16 May 22), Appendix C, for the components that make up a Full Assessment Run.	30-27 points More than enough data/information is identified and presented to support the staff member’s analysis, conclusions, and recommendations. Effective development of the 14 point of the rubric.
Analysis and conclusions (40%) The analysis and conclusions must be comprehensive, prioritizing problems, risks, shortcomings, identifying actions against the enemy, and logically relying on data	40-36 points It prioritized most of the major problems, risks, shortcomings, and potential enemy actions from the previous responses, and summarized the largest some of the critical information that the commander must understand.
Recommendations (30%) Identify the most supported COA for the War function with explanations and potential improvements. In addition, it identifies areas where the commander can take risks with a mitigation plan.	30-27 points It recommended the most defensible COA from the perspective of the assigned, Intelligence (WfF )War fighting function or possible critical improvements to the COA from the perspective of the assigned WfF. He provided an excellent explanation of why the student supported the COA. The student recommended where the Commander can take risks as far as his assigned WfF is concerned and recommended excellent mitigation for that risk.

Facts (Identify 1-2 critical facts relevant to your WfF and explain the impact to the WfF and/or mission) <Enter your answer here.>

Assumptions (Identify 1-2 assumptions relevant to your WfF and explain the impact to the WfF and/or mission) <Enter your answer here.>

Constraints (Identify at least one constraint relevant to your MISO Intelligence warfighting function and explain the impact to the MISO Intelligence war fighting function and/or mission) <Enter your answer here.>

Specified Tasks (List of Specified Tasks for your MISO Intelligence war fighting function) <Enter your answer here.>

Implicit tasks (Identify at least one implicit task, including purpose, for your WfF) <Enter your answer here.>

Friendly Systems, Capabilities and Requirements (Identify 1. WfF’s internal equipment and systems; 2. the additional WfF resources available at a higher level; 3. Identify what is needed to execute the mission; 4. and the WfF capabilities of other military or civilian partners, as applicable) <MISO Intelligence war fighting function  internal equipment and systems resources><Additional MISO Intelligence war fighting function resources available at higher echelons>< are the requirements of your MISO Intelligence war fighting function >.< MISO Intelligence war fighting function capabilities of other military or civilian partners>.

Friendly Deficiencies (Compare requirements to your WfF’s current capabilities and suggest solutions to meet discrepancies)

Risk (Identify at least one risk relevant to your WfF and recommend measures to mitigate it) <Enter your answer here.>

Enemy Forces (Within your WfF, describe the composition of enemy systems and their capabilities, their readiness, their estimated strength, and their potential effects) <Composition of enemy systems and their capabilities, within their WfF><Disposition of the enemy, within his WfF.><Estimated enemy strength and how you determined it, within your WfF><Potential effects of the enemy>

Intelligence Requirements (Enemy) (Recommend an IR for your WfF and explain why it’s important) <Enter your answer here.>

Information Requirements (Friendly Forces) (Recommend an IR (Friendly Forces) for your WfF and explain why it is important)

Friendly Information Essentials (EEFIs) (Recommend an EEFI for your WfF and explain why it is important) <Enter your answer here.>

Analysis and conclusions (Prioritize the main issues, risks, shortcomings, and possible actions of the enemy from your previous responses and summarize critical information that the commander must understand) <Enter your answer here.>

Recommendations (Recommend the COA for more support from your MISO Intelligence war fighting function perspective, or potential improvements to the COA from your WfF perspective if it is a single COA and explain why.) (Recommend where the Commander can take risks/mitigations as far as WfF is concerned.) <Enter your answer here.>