The graduate integrates and synthesizes competencies from across the degree program and thereby demonstrates the ability to participate in and contribute value to the chosen professional field.
INTRODUCTION
Note: Before starting this task, ensure that you have passed Task 1. If you have not yet passed Task 1, the Task 2 submission will be returned without evaluation.
In this task, you will synthesize key concepts learned within your MSML program and then apply them by developing a management and leadership development program for a real-world business entity. You will first need to select an organization with which you are familiar. You may choose your current place of employment, a local business, a nonprofit organization, or any operating organization (e.g., government, school district, hospital, online business).
The management and leadership development program you design should include a process to foster the management and leadership skills of current and future leaders within an organization. These skills would be employed in formal and informal leadership positions throughout the company. The program should be targeted towards a specific leadership audience in the organization.
Note: Any information that would be considered confidential, proprietary, or personal in nature should not be included in the actual task submission to WGU. Do not include the actual names of people, suppliers, the company, or other identifiable information. Fictional names should be used. Also, company-specific data, including financial information, should not be included but should be addressed in a general fashion as appropriate
REQUIREMENTS
Your submission must be your original work. No more than a combined total of 30% of the submission and no more than a 10% match to any one individual source can be directly quoted or closely paraphrased from sources, even if cited correctly. An originality report is provided when you submit your task that can be used as a guide.
You must use the rubric to direct the creation of your submission because it provides detailed criteria that will be used to evaluate your work. Each requirement below may be evaluated by more than one rubric aspect. The rubric aspect titles may contain hyperlinks to relevant portions of the course.
Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc., unless specified in the task requirements. All other submissions must be file types that are uploaded and submitted as attachments (e.g., .docx, .pdf, .ppt).
A. Discuss the organization for which you are developing the management and leadership development program, including the following:
- size
- number of employees
- type of business (including services or products)
- years in business
- form of business ownership (e.g., sole proprietor, LLC, corporation)
- current locations
B. Provide an overview of the current management and leadership development program at the organization identified in part A by doing the following:
- Explain the business need for a management and leadership development program.
- Describe how the current development process prepares current and future managers and leaders, including the following components:
- the training process
- leadership development techniques, including curriculum, materials, or resources
- two efficiencies in the program
- two inefficiencies in the program
C. Create a new management and leadership development program by doing the following:
- Discuss your proposed program, including how the program prepares current and future managers and leaders.
a. Explain how your development program meets the organization’s business need identified in part B1. - Select one of the following target audiences and explain how your program meets the needs of this audience:
- new and aspiring leaders within the organization
- current leaders seeking to further their leadership knowledge within their current roles
- experienced leaders seeking promotion to senior leadership roles
a. Discuss three areas of management and leadership that are important to develop within the audience selected in part C2. Support your discussion with one unique scholarly source from your Task 1 submission for each of the three areas.
Note: These might include emotional intelligence, human resource management, change management, strategic management, or any other areas of leadership and management learned over the course of your program.
Note: A scholarly source is written by an expert for an audience of other experts, researchers, or students. Additionally, you may cite other reputable editor-reviewed articles and books. A reputable source is defined as an article from a respected industry publication, government organization, educational institution, or industry leader. These can be found in the WGU Library or within the course.
- Describe the training process for your program.
- Describe the leadership development techniques, including curriculum, materials, or resources.
- Explain how your program capitalizes upon the efficiencies and overcomes the inefficiencies identified in part B2.
- Describe the incentives provided to individuals for participation in your program.
- Describe the timeline for completion of your program, including milestones.
- Describe how participants will demonstrate their knowledge from your program.
- Describe three quantitative metrics that will be used to evaluate the overall effectiveness of your management and leadership development program and the expected effect on the organization.
D. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
E. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! – _ . * ‘ ( )
File size limit: 200 MB
File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
Rubric
A:Organization Overview
Not Evident
The submission does not discuss an organization or does not include all the given points.
Approaching Competence
The submission discusses the chosen organization, including all the given points, but the discussion is not supported by specific details.
Competent
The submission discusses the chosen organization, includes all the given points, and is supported by specific details.
B1:Business Need for Development Program
Not Evident
The submission does not explain the business need for a management and leadership development program.
Approaching Competence
The submission explains the business need for a management and leadership development program, but the explanation is not supported by specific details.
Competent
The submission explains the business need for a management and leadership development program and is supported by specific details.
B2:Current Development Process
Not Evident
The submission either does not describe how the current development process prepares current and future managers and leaders, or the description does not include all the given points.
Approaching Competence
submission describes how the current development process prepares current and future managers and leaders, including all the given points, but the description is not supported by specific details.
Competent
The submission describes how the current development process prepares current and future manager and leaders, includes all the given points, and is supported by specific details.
C1:Proposed Program Overview
Not Evident
The submission does not discuss the proposed program or does not include how the program prepares current and future managers and leaders.
Approaching Competence
The submission discusses the proposed program, including how the program prepares current and future managers and leaders, but the discussion is not supported by specific details.
Competent
The submission discusses the proposed program, including how the program prepares current and future managers and leaders, and is supported by specific details.
C1a:Meeting Business Need
Not Evident
The submission does not explain how the development program meets the business need identified in part B1.
Approaching Competence
The submission explains how the development program meets the business need identified in part B1, but the explanation is not supported by specific details, or it contains inaccuracies.
Competent
The submission accurately explains how the development program meets the business need identified in part B1 and is supported by specific details.
C2:Target Audience
Not Evident
The submission does not explain how the program meets the needs of the selected target audience.
Approaching Competence
The submission explains how the program meets the needs of the selected target audience, but the explanation is not supported by specific details, or it contains inaccuracies.
Competent
The submission accurately explains how the program meets the needs of the selected target audience and is supported by specific details.
C2a:Three Areas of Leadership
Not Evident
The submission does not discuss 3 areas of management and leadership to develop within the audience selected in part C2.
Approaching Competence
The submission discusses 3 areas of management and leadership to develop within the audience selected in part C2, but the discussion is not supported by specific details or contains inaccuracies. Or the discussion for each area is not supported by 1 unique scholarly source from Task 1.
Competent
The submission accurately discusses 3 areas of management and leadership to develop within the audience selected in part C2 and is supported by specific details. The discussion for each area is supported by 1 unique scholarly source from Task 1.
C3:Training Process
Not Evident
The submission does not describe the training process for the program.
Approaching Competence
The submission describes the training process, but the description is not supported by specific details, or the training process is not appropriate.
Competent
The submission describes an appropriate training process for the program and is supported by specific details.
C4:Leadership Development Techniques
Not Evident
The submission does not describe the leadership development techniques, including curriculum, materials, or resources.
Approaching Competence
The submission describes the leadership development techniques, including curriculum, materials, or resources, but the description is not supported by specific details, or the techniques described are not appropriate.
Competent
The submission describes appropriate leadership development techniques, including curriculum, materials, or resources, and the description is supported by specific details.
C5:Efficiencies and Inefficiencies
Not Evident
The submission does not explain how the program capitalizes upon the efficiencies and overcomes the inefficiencies identified in part B2.
Approaching Competence
The submission explains how the program capitalizes upon the efficiencies and overcomes the inefficiencies identified in part B2, but the explanation is not supported by specific details, or it contains inaccuracies.
Competent
The submission accurately explains how the program capitalizes upon the efficiencies and overcomes the inefficiencies identified in part B2, and the explanation is supported by specific details.
C6:Incentives
Not EvidentThe submission does not describe the incentives provided to individuals for participation in the program.
Approaching Competence
The submission describes the incentives provided to individuals for participation in the program, but it is not supported by specific details, or the incentives described are not appropriate.
Competent
The submission describes appropriate incentives provided to individuals for participation in the program and is supported by specific details.
C7:Timeline
Not Evident
The submission does not describe the timeline for completion in the program or include milestones.
Approaching Competence
The submission describes the timeline for completion in the program, including milestones, but either the timeline or the milestones are not appropriate. Or the description is not supported by specific details.
Competent
The submission describes an appropriate timeline for completion in the program, including milestones, and is supported by specific details.
C8:Demonstration of Knowledge
Not Evident
The submission does not describe how participants will demonstrate their knowledge from the program.
Approaching Competence
The submission describes how participants will demonstrate their knowledge from the program, but the description is not supported by specific details.
Competent
The submission describes how participants will demonstrate their knowledge from the program and is supported by specific details.
C9:Three Metrics
Not Evident
The submission does not describe 3 quantitative metrics to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the development program or the expected effect on the organization.
Approaching Competence
The submission describes 3 quantitative metrics to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the development program and describes the expected effect on the organization, but the description is not supported by specific details or it contains inaccuracies.
Competent
The submission accurately describes 3 quantitative metrics to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the development program and accurately describes the expected effect on the organization. The description is supported by specific details.
D:Sources
Not Evident
The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
Approaching Competence
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.
Competent
The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
E:Professional Communication
Not Evident
Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.
Approaching Competence
Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.
Competent
Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
Do you need help with this assignment or any other? We got you! Place your order and leave the rest to our experts.